View Full Version : Planes?
baller4life2468
9th Mar 2007, 02:07 AM
Ok. So I thought about the differences of BF 2 and 2142. Obviously a BIG one is no Planes.
Now I want people to input 1 advantage/disadvantage(depending on how you voted) of having or not having planes.
I say it is better because there isnt as many force TKs.
minfootball
9th Mar 2007, 02:16 AM
planes where dumb eveyone fought over who got it and then all the pilot would do is fight other planes or all the good pilots would be on one team and demolish anyone that was on the ground. (plus i never figured all the controls out in those jets)
tigershilone
9th Mar 2007, 02:18 AM
I say it's better now because the bomber cannot way overcompensate and skew the score for one side if the pilot is zomg incredible. Levels the playing field that the aircraft is not so overpowering anymore.
Tiger_Shilone
mapes
9th Mar 2007, 03:36 AM
I say it's better now because the bomber cannot way overcompensate and skew the score for one side if the pilot is zomg incredible. Levels the playing field that the aircraft is not so overpowering anymore.
Tiger_Shilone
You mean its better because MCA dosn't have a plane? :)
I do tend to think that the jets were just about absolute if you had a good pilot. Where as in a helo you could own but, it was way easier to get taken out.
ChrisWW11
9th Mar 2007, 09:42 AM
ahh i remember the good old days of the j-10...wow the memories anyway the j-10 was sick considering it was the fastest but the heli is fun if your have a co-pilot. :2thumbs: :2thumbs:
GeneralSnake
9th Mar 2007, 12:02 PM
Maybe I shouldn't have voted, I have played 2 but didn't own, so I didn't do much flying. I played alot of Vietnam but never flew, I was completely infatuated with ground action. I remember many times when me and many other fellow NVA are heading towards an enemy flag and you hear the engines humming, slowly getting louder until you see the plane(s) and half of your force is burnt to oblivion. I miss the planes, but was never exposed to the damage you all talk of.
Premonition
9th Mar 2007, 12:21 PM
1) Balance. was the number 1 reason.
Lack of effective ant air weapons made them pretty untouchable.
2) bombing runs: see example 1
3) campers and tk`ers: seeing a third of your team fighting over a vehicle is crazy.
EA could have fixed the issues with jets but chose not to.
1) the upgraded AA that you sit in and made jets about worthless. people complained and they switched it back in the deadest patch of all times 1.3
2) they could add SF unlocks but never added a AA weapon to any kit. Lets be honest did anti-tank really need the p-90 :?
Switch p-90 with anti air rockets and the world would have been a better place.
3) random respawn rate or slower rate:
like 2142 with the attack heli vs the flying cow
4) run out of fuel! This could have been a easy fix. Limit the time jets can be in the air.
Anytime you see someone with a 50-75 score and 1 death, you know there is a balance issue.
Dead...Again
9th Mar 2007, 12:23 PM
I voted yes. I think planes dominated the map too much if you had a good pilot or pilot/bomber combo. Especially since the AA was so horrible.
0r4ng1n4
9th Mar 2007, 05:51 PM
advantage: they were fun as hell to fly (and you could roll them :P ) and were the biggest challenge (i think) to be good at, next to heli.
minfootball
9th Mar 2007, 05:58 PM
the aa worked great against helis i dont see why everyone trashes it. the reload time had something to be desired though
Apache Warrior
9th Mar 2007, 07:14 PM
Trains and automobiles. :D
Apache
killa_zn
9th Mar 2007, 07:17 PM
Trains and automobiles. :D
Apache :?
thedeadlyassassin
9th Mar 2007, 07:22 PM
One advantage
---------------------
Gets rid of asshats, and J-10's
One Disadvantage
----------------------
Not as fun, you can't do stunts at all in 2142, and I loved doing stunts.
Apache Warrior
9th Mar 2007, 07:23 PM
Trains and automobiles. :D
Apache :?
Think Steve Martina and John Candy. :D
Apache
killa_zn
9th Mar 2007, 07:30 PM
Oh.. haha that movie, gosh that movie is older than me.
{DEAD}Therites
9th Mar 2007, 09:45 PM
I voted no.
But they did need fixing, I wouldn't want the exact planes from BF2 in this game. They need to be balanced, but they're fun as heck to fly, and add another facet to the game.
I think EMP would seriously demolish planes; At that speed -with poor landing capability- you'd be as good as dead.
baller4life2468
10th Mar 2007, 01:09 AM
Therites...im sorry but your name is kind of annoying...cuz when i say the rites i no it is wrong and i have to correct myself.
Back to topic...they did need fixing.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.